مظہر کلیم: پھر کب ملیں گے
Saturday, July 2, 2022
Mazhar Kaleem
Wednesday, June 22, 2022
The Challenge of Implementation
The challenge of implementation
"In Pakistan, since its inception, we have been confronted with some serious educational challenges and a shortage of qualified teachers is one of them. This problem was more serious in case of female teachers. In all education policies of
Pakistan, the need for effective teacher education has been underlined with some ambitious plans to improve the teacher education programmes. We do see quantitative expansion in teacher education programmes but the dream of quality teacher education programmes, in the public sector, is still not realized..."
Education Policies in Pakistan: Politics, Projections, and Practices (2015) By Dr. Shahid Siddiqui
Education Policies in Pakistan: Politics, Projections, and Practices (2015) By Dr. Shahid Siddiqui
Reviewed by Sajda Kausar, Iqra University, Karachi sajda_pk@yahoo.com
The author Dr. Shahid Siddiqui holds an exhaustive experience of teaching, teacher education, research and educational administration and currently holds the post of Vice Chancellor of Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad. His other works include Rethinking Education in Pakistan: Perceptions, Practices and Possibilities (2007); Adhe Adhoore Khawab(2010); Education, Inequalities, and Freedom: A Sociopolitical Critique (2010); and Language, Gender and Power: The Politics of Representation and Hegemony in South Asia (2014). To read complete review pl click here
Monday, March 18, 2019
Friday, March 1, 2019
Monday, February 4, 2019
Monday, December 31, 2018
Monday, December 17, 2018
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Ayesha Farooq: First Pakistani Fighter Pilot
Ayeah Farooq, who belongs to Bahawalpur, Punjab, is the first Pakistani fighter pilot. Congrats Ayesha. She is one of 19 women who have become pilots in the Pakistan Air Force over the last decade - there are five other female fighter pilots, but they have yet to take the final tests to qualify for combat.
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Review of Education, Inequalities, and Freedom
Based on a critique of inequalities nourished and perpetuated by our system of education, Dr. Siddiqui’s book gives us food for thought and presents a strategy and design for reshaping education in Pakistan
We need to strive for an assessment system which requires the students to think critically and apply knowledge in diverse contexts. For all these changes in learning, pedagogy, and assessment it is important that we revisit our ideology about the very aim of education. We need to challenge the transmission mode of education that supports the existing power structures and move to the transformation mode where the main objective of education is to reduce the socioeconomic gaps in society and empower the have-nots by maximizing their prospects in life.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Book Launch, "Education, Inequalities, and Freedom"
Book Launch of Education, Inequalities, and Freedom by Dr Siddiqui Siddiqui | ||||
Dr. Mumtaz Ahmad said that Dr. Shahid Siddiqui has excellently illustrated our education system in this book and figured unmatchable analysis with profound strengths. He said that the purpose of education should be to empower the peoples to establish strong living society and I am happy to say that Dr. Siddiqui has effectively work on this phenomenon in the form of a book. Dr. Mumtaz was of the view that our country should have integrated education system to equalize the education opportunities for all the classes of the society. Dr. Noor Amna Malik said that the book talks about issues and realities of our education system. She viewed that the book had excellently focused on teachers to deliver more effectively towards the quality education which is essential for development of any society. Source: Protocol and Public Relation Department (P&PR), IIUI. Email: iiuipublicrelations@iiu.edu.pk |
Saturday, April 10, 2010
THE SINKING PARADISE OF GOJAL BY DR SHAHID SIDDIQUI
The government needs to act fast. Gojal should be declared a calamity-hit area, extending rightful facilities to its residents. The debris removal work should be expedited by extending the shifts to 24 hours and increasing the labour and number of machines
Time’s winged chariot hurrying near;
And yonder all before us lie
Deserts of vast eternity”
— Andrew Marvell: ‘To His Coy Mistress’.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
New Education Policy
Monday, 14 Sep, 2009
THE minister of education has announced the National Education Policy (NEP) for the next decade. It is interesting that the previous education policy, for the period of 1998 to 2010, had still not expired.
The justification for a new policy given by the minister is that the last one was not producing the required results. But this could be said about all earlier policies which were a lot of rhetoric and always fell short of reality. Even a layperson would know that the problem was at the implementation level.
This was the case with the previous education policy. The goals were quite noble but there was no political will to realise those goals. Instead of tidying up the implementation process, the government opted for an easy solution — a new policy. By offering this, every government gets an opportunity to make attractive promises and sellable declarations.
The worth of an education policy is no more than a political ploy as one can see a ‘disconnect’ between policies and practices in Pakistan. For instance, the education policy which now declares that English should be a compulsory subject is not new as this decision was taken in Musharraf’s regime and was announced by the then education minister, Zobaida Jalal. Similarly there is a ‘disconnect’ between policy declarations and budget allocations. NEP 2010 however, is different from previous education policies on the count that its process of designing started almost three years before. A number of seminars and meetings were organised apparently to draw the consensus of different groups of stakeholders.
The NEP looks like a long wish list. It’s replete with promises ranging from allocation to achievement of ambitious goals. Those who are familiar with the fate of previous policies consider the new policy as ‘too good to be true’. Let us look at some salient features of the document. The most important announcement is that the allocation for education would be seven per cent of the national GDP by 2015.
Can we trust this statement? Despite our desire, there are problems. If we look at the trend in the allocation to education in the last three years, we realise the reason for the reluctance to believe in the promise made by NEP 2010. In 2006-7 the allocation was 2.5 per cent of GDP and in 2007-8 this was reduced to 2.47 per cent. This year (2008-9) the amount further came down to 2.1 per cent of GDP.
These declining figures allude to ground realities where one can see a gaping chasm between professed ideas and actual deeds. Similar good news was shared by Mr Shaukat Aziz, the then prime minister, who promised that the allocation to education would be raised to four per cent of GDP. Instead of catching up with the raised figure, we sadly saw a decline.
Without suspecting the intentions of the minister of education, one can identify practical difficulties in releasing the promised amount by the ministry of finance. Speaking on a TV show, the minister of education admitted that the dynamics pertaining to the release of funds have not been sorted out. This aspect becomes all the more important as, in the past, actual release/spending was far less than the allocated amount.
Another ‘too good to be true’ announcement is that the level of public-sector schools will be lifted to match the levels of good private schools. And the deadline for this humongous task is 2010. Such statements tend to backfire. A natural response to the statement is, ‘how’.
Is there a magic wand which can turn sick units of public schools into private-sector schools? What does it take to improve the quality? Is it just buildings, or books, or teachers, or administration, or assessment or school milieu or a blend of all that constitute the notion of quality? How can this be done in a year?
Another very ambitious declaration is that, 'a common curricular framework in general as well as professional education will be applied to educational institutions in both the public and private sectors.' The question remains the same: how? There is no strategy mentioned in the policy document that could make us believe that this goal is attainable.
The NEP claims that the literacy rate will be enhanced to 86 per cent by 2015. This seems to be another promise which looks good on paper but its implementation is not that easy. Besides quantitative expansion, i.e. increase in the literacy rate, it is important to have a specific strategy for qualitative improvement of education in the country. The policy fails to provide a vision on the most important issue — social injustice and economic disparity. How can education be used to reduce gaps between the haves and the have-nots? How can it prepare thinking human beings? How can it challenge some of the taboos, fixed mindsets, and intolerance in society? Unfortunately the existing education system is widening the gap between the rich and the poor.
The central issue that needed to be tackled in the policy is the educational apartheid: elite and poor education. So the problem will not be solved by declaring free education up to matriculation. The issue involves the opportunities a public-sector school gives to a matriculate as compared to a student who gets an ‘O’ level certificate from an elite English-medium school.
The state seems to have given up on its responsibility to provide education and is thus relying too much on the private sector. This has turned public-sector schools into sick units. The policy does not talk about any strategy to bring qualitative improvement in public-sector educational institutions. On the whole, the policy focuses on the whys and whats but skilfully ignores the real issues of who and how. One wonders why such a significant document was not presented in parliament. A thorough discussion in parliament on the document could have enhanced its ownership and credibility.
The writer is a director at Lahore School of Economics and author of Rethinking Education in Pakistan.
Friday, October 30, 2009
Review: Adhe Adhoore Khawab
Review by Fawaz Niaz
Dr Shahid Siddiqui is widely known in the academic circles for his writings on interrelationship of language, education and politics. His recent book is a socio-political novel in Urdu with a contemporary story narrated in a gripping style. The novel has already started creating ripples in the literary world and received rich tribute form eminent critics of Urdu literature. Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik, considers this novel as “a trend setter in Urdu literature”. Asif Farrukhi, a famous short story writer looks at this novel as a blend of “scholarship and literature where a social scientist has derived his narrative from his own experience.” The themes of the novel range from love, politics, inequality, coercion of state and education. The novel uses dramatic technique by making use of dialogue to portray and expose characters. The novel is simply “unputdownable” and this characteristic of the novel is acknowledged by the famous short story writer Dr Rasheed Amjad who writes in his review that the story of the novel is so compelling that it makes us read it. According to him, “there is a fascinating harmony among story, expression, and style.”
Author: Dr Shahid Siddiqui
Published by Jahangir Books
Enterprise: 2009
Page: 176
Price: 250\
Buy online: http://jbdpress.com




